Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Construction projects in Providence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Construction projects in Providence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1) "Construction projects" is an unclear topic. Is it intended to be a list of all notable construction projects in the history of Providence since its founding? Or is it more of a "news" or "current events" topic, about current construction projects at this moment? If the former, doesn't the article "Timeline of Providence" cover it sufficiently? If the latter, then it is not particularly encyclopedic 2) It's outdated by at least ten years 3) A search for "construction projects in ..." brings up no similar articles for other cities 4) no other articles link to this Kzirkel (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Kzirkel (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Whatever this is trying to be, it's not working, and it's not encyclopediac. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It was a spirited attempt to keep up with downtown construction projects that hasn't been tended to in over a decade.Louiedog (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. NavjotSR (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unencyclopedic, more than a decade out of date. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - at some point, this subject becomes obsolete. And although Providence is important, it isn't and will never be able to be big enough to justify a list of buildings built in xxxx article, and where else could this go? WP:NOTNEWS applies I'd say. 174.254.193.245 (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.